Oscar Breakdown
Justin: So, what did you think?
Zoe: Eh… What did you think?
Justin: Yeah I think “Eh” sums it up fairly well. Not that there weren’t highlights to the night.
Zoe: Well of course. I enjoyed watching the Red Carpet on E! and seeing all the stars looking their best. I especially enjoyed Natalie Portman, Halle Berry, Reese Witherspoon, Scarlett Johanson, and Justin Timerlake had a sweet Tom For Suite tailored by Tom Ford himself. I also thought it was nice to see the Oscars trying to appeal to a younger crowd. The Inception-inspired opening was great.
Justin: I enjoyed the opening as well. Although I felt like the banter went down considerably afterwards. It was like they were trying not to stir up a controversy like what happened to Ricky Gervais. It was like they said, “try to be funny and charming without really being funny.” I did enjoy the “musical” montage they did with Harry Potter and a couple of other movies. The whole show was enjoyable but didn’t push the edge or really make me go “WOW.”
Zoe: I agree, I thought that James Franco and Anne Hathaway made a lovely couple hosting the Oscars, but James Franco was kind of too low key and poor Anne was left to keep the pep level up. She did admirably though. Some of the presenters’ banter was hokey, but you know I loved Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law’s. I know you loved Helen Mirren and Russell Brand’s faux translation bit.
Justin: There were also no real surprises. In what the lower categories (for the technical aspects of film), it was pretty much taken over by Inception which makes sense. Then when it came to awards like director, actor/actresses and film of the year, there were still no real surprise. It seemed like you predicted pretty well about who might win what. I think the only real surprise this year was the fact they only ran over by about 11 minutes.
Zoe: Exactly, and this is my problem with award shows these days. I like festivals that award a prize that amounts to honorable mentions, and shows like the BAFTAs (the British Oscars) that have an award for “Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema, “Outstanding Debut,” and “Orange Wednesdays Rising Star Award.” I think it would be better to just announce the top five performances by a male in a leading role and be done. No ranking, no winner and losers, et cetera. I think it’s enough for the Academy, and other voting bodies that give out awards, to present us with who was the best. Then they can just bring them up on stage and say their name, show a clip, let them say literally “Thank you,” and then everyone can clap. We all already know which are the most successful films, fiscally speaking.
Justin: Right! The Oscars are like the last big film show of the season. However, before the Oscars, shows like the BAFTAs and the Golden Globes take place. These shows sort of spoil the whole Oscars experience because really they are a good indicator of who is going to win during the Oscars. This year it was no surprise to me that The King’s Speech and The Social Network did well, because that is all that I’ve heard about for the last few months. It is great that The King’s Speech won because it was a wonderful movie but there was no excitement in hearing it announced. Everyone was pretty much predicting that it was going to win along with Colin Firth and Natalie Portman for best actor/actress.
Zoe: Yeah, I agree. But that doesn’t mean that the performers don’t deserve recognition. But it does mean that it’s like this self-defeating cycle. They hype the performances, the awards, and then the nominees and for the most part the winners are a foregone conclusion when the awards air. So then the whole thing is totally about the looks on the Red Carpet and who does something nutty in their acceptance speech. Like Melissa Leo dropping the F bomb last night.
Justin: Speaking of flubs. I loved when Anne Hathaway screwed up her lines toward the end and then told the viewers at home to drink (aka take a shot.) To me that just shows how great she did. She didn’t care if she “messed up.” She rolled with the punches and made a joke. It wasn’t like there was no one in the whole of the US playing a drinking game to the Oscars. Hell if we were in the same state I am sure we would have.
Zoe: That is so true. I think it’s a good angle not to take themselves so seriously over there.
Justin: Moving on to disappointments of the night. I am going to say that my biggest ones were in the music categories. One of the main reasons I tune in each year to the Oscars is to see who is up for the best score and best original song. That is just the kind of nerd I am. It never surprises me to see some of the bigger names nominated for best score such as John Williams or this year’s Hans Zimmer. However, I do like to see those artists that I haven’t heard before and I love to see them win. This year though was a huge mistake in my opinion. First off, out of every score they played, The Social Network’s was my least favorite and of course it won. Then I come to find out, thanks to you Zoe, that the guy who wrote the score was the lead singer of Nine Inch Nails. Ummm no. This should not happen.
Zoe: Jeez, Justin! Musicians can transition into other fields. Look at Marky Mark Wahlberg out there!
Justin: I agree. Mark Wahlberg is a fabulous actor. The score that I heard last night did not compare to the score from Inception, The King’s Speech or 127 Hours. Heck even How To Train Your Dragon was better in my opinion. I guess I will have to hear more of The Social Network’s score to understand what was so great about it. Now, the category of best original song was a complete bomb and I think you’d agree with me. I am sure that Randy Newman had some great songs when he was first starting out. But I swear everything since then has sounded the same and last night’s was no different. It sounded the same as the song in the first Toy Story movie. The only reason I can see the Academy giving him that award is out of pity. He is an older gentleman, who has been in the business awhile, he has had 20 nominations and only one win. It was like they said, “Ok let’s just give it to him this year.” I must say I really enjoyed the sound of the song from 127 hours. Even the Country Strong song was great. Although it is weird think of Gwyneth Paltrow as a country singer, but there is a good example of transitioning into other fields. She has a nice voice.
Zoe: It’s like the weirdness of letting Toy Story 3 be nominated for best animated feature and best film. It doesn’t make sense that that would even be allowed. Shouldn’t it be one or the other?
Justin: I guess that was the Academy’s attempt to put a comedy in the best picture category.
Zoe: I mean, it had some comedic moments, of course, like Buzz being reset to Spanish. But it was really sad overall; I totally cried. Comedies just get shafted, and so do all the great comedic actors… unless they go dramatic, like Jim Carrey. For all the Academy tried to go younger with the hosts and The Social Network, they’re still just really outdated in my mind. An American in Paris was a comedy and it won for best picture. What happened??
Justin: Exactly. It is like well comedies are there to make us happy and laugh, but they aren’t “real” films. To be a real film you must make it as sad as you can or as drama filled as possible. That funny stuff, we don’t want that near our “works of art.” It doesn’t make sense. It takes a lot of effort for a comedian to make a good movie. It can’t be too over the top or to boring. There has to be that perfect balance and it takes a lot of work. To do drama, all you do is put on a sad face and hope that it rains a lot. I know this isn’t true, I am a fan of dramas, but you see my point. Making a movie is hard work no matter what the genre.
Zoe: There are a lot of movies in recent years that were really dark comedies, basically, like American Beauty and Shakespeare in Love and nominees like Little Miss Sunshine. I don’t think there’s an actor that would disagree with you on how hard comedy is. I watch a lot of Inside the Actors Studio and a lot of them say that comedy is something they want to do more of, and that it’s much harder for them than drama in a lot of ways. If actors respect it, then why shouldn’t the Academy? I think more normal people, not artsy film lovers, love comedies, and the more subversive they are, the more they deal with series issues in a funny way, the more people love them. Look at Superbad and Knocked Up. On the one hand, they are juvenile comedies about man-children, but on a deeper level, they’re about friendship, growing up and figuring out who you are and getting some self-confidence in that. Do you think the message of The King’s Speech was really that different? I sure don’t.
Justin: I couldn’t agree more and I would love to see more comedies being given at least a seat at the table. They might not win for a few years but let’s show actors that it is okay to do a comedy and that if you do so and it is good, it can still be nominated. I have one last complaint about the Oscars, speaking of best pictures. Why the hell in the last two years has the list of nominees gone up? It use to be you pick four or five films from everything put out. Now it is like well let’s just keep adding on. Like you said Toy Story 3 really had no business being in that category if it was already in Best Animated Film. It can’t be that hard to whittle it down. I have not seen all the nominations yet but I am sure that there were five in there that were better than the other five.
Zoe: I don’t remember what their official reason was. Probably to try to appease people for some reason or another, but whatever, it was a stupid plan. That is just too many movies and it makes them look weak. They know what the five best out of those ten are, come on. If you’re going to rank things, do it. If you’re going to wimp out, we’re all going to know it and say every year that the broadcast sucked, there were no surprises and that we swear we won’t watch the next year.
Justin: It is like in Little League when you make sure everyone has hit the ball or in soccer where it must touch everyone’s feet before a goal can be shot. I am sorry if there are better players they should play. The weaker player should be given the chance but not to the extent as to praise them for nothing. It teaches us nothing. If you say a film is nominated for the best film of the year and it really wasn’t that great, the crew is just going to go back and make the same kind of film thinking it was good. No improvement. There are other strengths you have. Strive to be the best if that is really what you want. Five more nominees in the best picture category is like everyone getting consolation cake.
Zoe: To be fair, the ten nominees were great films, but obviously they can’t all be the best. But it’s just silly. The Academy is all over the place. I wish we had played a drinking game to it now!
Justin: There will always be years to come. Speaking of things to come, any idea as to what is in store for our readers with your post this week?
Zoe: I wish I could say it’s top secret, but I honestly haven’t picked a topic yet. Why, is there some opinion of mine you don’t know yet that you want do discover?
Justin: Always, but in this case was just curious as to things that may come. That and I thought it would be a good way to end this post.
Zoe: I’ll try to come up with something awesome. Wouldn’t want you to be let down twice in one week.
Justin: You could never let me down especially after your rants on Disney and Body Image. Classics. Look forward to this week’s as well. Until then. See you next week everyone.
Zoe: Ciao, bellas!